Once I decided to start taking the
month of December as nothing but Christmas programs, one episode came to mind
immediately and that was Yes Minister,
Party Games. I wrote about this
episode in a more compressed way back in May as I picked it as part of my
article on Memorable Final Episodes. This episode
accomplishes a lot in an hour. It is a partial Christmas episode, it is a
partial New Year’s episode, but most importantly it takes our character Jim
Hacker and elevates him to Prime Minister. Obviously, I did not see this on
transmission on BBC2 back in 1984. It would be interesting to know if viewers
had any idea that this was going to happen. When watching the episode from the
beginning, it gives no indication that by the end of it that Hacker would be
the political leader of the UK. Yes Jim Hacker! How do we get there?
Party
Games TX: 17/12/84
It had been nearly 2 years since we
had last seen Hacker, Sir Humphrey, and Bernard with the end of Yes Minister Series 3. I have said it
before; this is what I love about British television. A series can disappear
for a few years but come back as if nothing has happened. It’s kind of like
real life, we lose touch with people but then we get back together with them as
if nothing has happened. Well it appears like nothing has really happened with
Jim. Some of his duties may have changes a little bit but he is still a cog in
the political machine with Bernard Woolley still with him.
There is an absurdity within the
series that makes this so much fun to watch. It is probably even more fun since
the absurdity is only mirroring real life. After all this is a satire. There is
much going on here that rings very true with the politician at the time. There
is a reason why this was Prime Minister Thatcher’s favourite series. The first
absurdity is the sheer amount of holiday cards that Hacker needs to sign and
based on who the cards are going to Hacker will need to sign the cards differently.
There is something else that is troubling Jim. The European Commission, based
on new European regulation, wants to have the classic British sausage to be
renamed the Emulsified High-Fat Offal Tube. Hacker knows that this would be
very unpopular, especially for him politically. For Sir Humphrey, things are going a bit better. Humphrey is meeting with his boss and mentor Sir Arnold. Sir Arnold is about to retire and needs to figure out who is successor is going to be. You see, Arnold needs someone who knows how to ask the “key” questions. Humphrey certainly knows how to do that as he asks Arnold if he has given any thought to what he was going to do after he retires? This question is more to do with what sort of key chairmanships that Humphrey could line Arnold up with that would yield very little work but a ton of money. Arnold likes his thinking and puts forward Humphrey’s name as his successor. In this episode, as in any other episode, any scene with Humphrey and Arnold are gold. There is nothing likeable about either character yet they are immensely likeable. I also enjoy the dialogue between them as if those two alone are the ones running everything and everyone else is basically window dressing or game pieces moved around strategically.
When it comes time for Humphrey to
tell Jim about his new role, Jim mistakes it as if Humphrey is dying.
“Humphrey, you’re so terribly brave!” Finally Jim catches on congratulates
Humphrey on the accession to Cabinet Secretary. "So Humpy, you are going
do to the Prime Minister what you have always done to me......for me." They
both decide to let the other staff members know about this new appointment at
the Holiday drinks party. At that party,
we find an incredibly drunk Jim Hacker. Everyone else drinks at that party with
more control but Hacker is really letting it loose. He gives a speech about
Humphrey which is pretty incoherent and is just a general mess. He decides to
drive home even though his wife Annie begs him to allow her to drive. Because
this is all just good comedy and instead of this turning into a “very special
episode”, the next shot is of the Hacker’s driving down the street going about
5 miles per hour. The police pull him over and give him a verbal warning after
finding out who Hacker is and what role he has in government.
Hacker is eventually called into
the Cabinet Secretary office who is now Sir Humphrey and Humphrey gives him a
stern warning. Though, it’s not all that bad. At least it wasn’t like the Home
Secretary who was picked up for drunken driving causing an accident with a
lorry loaded with nuclear waste. Of course, it was the Home Secretary who
initiated the holiday campaign, “Don’t Drink and Drive at Christmas”. The Home
Secretary resigns from his position which leads to all sort of interesting
events in the episode. Bernard is at the Hacker home waiting for Jim to get
back. Annie and Bernard turn on the news only to find out that the Prime Minister is
resigning in the New Year. At that moment, Hacker comes in and all three of
them are astonished by the news. All sorts of amazing rumours are going around
about the Prime Minister. Jim heard that the Prime Minister was actually a KGB
agent. That’s not Bernard heard:
Bernard Woolley: Minister, I've
heard something quite different.
Jim Hacker: What? Bernard Woolley: That there is £1 million worth of diamonds from South Africa in a Downing Street safe, but of course it's only a rumour.
Jim Hacker: Is that true?
Bernard Woolley: Oh, yes.
Jim Hacker: So, there ARE all those diamonds in Downing Street!
Bernard Woolley: Are there?
Jim Hacker: You just said there were.
Bernard Woolley: No, I didn't.
Jim Hacker: Yes, you did! You said you'd heard this rumour, I said is it true, you said yes!
Bernard Woolley: I said yes, it was true that it was a rumour.
Jim Hacker: You said you heard it was true!
Bernard Woolley: No, I said it was true that I heard it!
Annie Hacker: I'm sorry to cut into this important discussion, but do you believe it?
Jim Hacker: I believe I heard it. Oh, about the diamonds. No.
Annie Hacker: Is it impossible?
Jim Hacker: No, but it's never been officially denied. First rule in politics: never believe anything until it's officially denied.
Jim Hacker is called into the Sir
Humphrey’s office again. There he finds not only Humphrey but also the Chief
Whip. Humphrey looked into Eric and Duncan’s MI5 files and found some disturbing
information. As Party Chairman, Hacker needed to see this. There was some dicey
stuff going on with the two candidates. The three men in the Cabinet
Secretary’s office discuss the seriousness of the situation:
Jim Hacker: "Yes, well this is serious."Chief Whip: "Very serious."
Sir Humphrey: "Very serious."
Jim Hacker: "What could happen if either of them became PM?"
Sir Humphrey: "Something very serious indeed."
Chief Whip: "Very serious."
Jim Hacker: "I see...."
Chief Whip: "Serious repercussions."
Sir Humphrey: "Serious repercussions."
Chief Whip: "Of the utmost seriousness."
Jim Hacker: "Yes, that is serious."
Sir Humphrey: "In fact, I would go so far as to say, that it could hardly be more serious."
Jim Hacker: "Well, I think we all agree then: this is serious."
Finally, the Chief Whip asks if
Hacker had any thoughts of doing the job himself. This is a great scene because
a lot of what Jim is doing in this scene is exactly why Humphrey and Arnold
thought he would be perfect for them as Prime Minister. When he is told he can
look into the MI5 files of Eric and Duncan, he whips out his glasses and is as
happy as a child with the thought of looking into someone else’s files. Then,
after Hacker is warming to the idea of becoming Prime Minister, he is not sure
what he should do or how he should respond to questions. Humphrey is, off the
top of his said, saying how Hacker should respond to press questions at which
point we cut back to Jim writing down all of what Humphrey is saying word for
word. Also in this scene playing Chief Whip is James Grout. I adore James Grout
especially as Granville in All Creatures
Great & Small. Everything I have seen him in makes me smile.
Jim meets with both Eric and Duncan
to get them to bow out of the race. These scenes show us a pretty strong Jim
Hacker who takes care of business with both of them. Now, Jim needs to get to work with campaigning
for Prime Minister without campaigning for it. He needs to pick something that
can be a victory for him. He chooses his battle to save the British Sausage. He
creates the illusion to the public that the British Sausage is to become
illegal under European regulation. He invites the press in for an impromptu
conference in his office to alert them to this horrific turn of events. He eventually
gives a passionate speech that is covered by both the BBC and ITN condemning
the EEC for making the British Sausage illegal. Hacker speaks with the cadence
of Churchill and is actually pretty dynamic. He has a ton of energy in the
scene and there is a very realistic feel to that speech. Of course, little does
everyone know that Hacker and Humphrey have already met with Maurice from the
EEC in which Maurice agrees that they do not need to call the British Sausage
the Emulsified High-Fat Offal Tube but it can have the name of the British Sausage.
Hacker even gets an interview with the great British news personality, Ludovic
Kennedy. Things are serious.
Finally, Hacker is called into
Humphrey’s office where he is informed his party is voting to see if there are
any other candidates to will oppose Hacker for the office of Prime Minister. After
Hacker is confused by multiple ringing phones in Humphrey’s office, Hacker is
confirmed as the next Prime Minister.
This episode is a triumph for the
series. A lot of the episodes show Hacker and Humphrey on different sides of
all the issues and forcing out a compromise only to get one or the other out of
trouble. This episode sees both of them working together. Humphrey is still
scheming to get his way. He doesn’t want Jim as Prime Minister because he
respects him. He feels like Hacker will allow him to run the government the way
he wants to run it. There is a great feel to the whole episode and what I love
about this series is that there are a lot of people running out to different
buildings for meeting. People are driven around in other cars to other places
and there is a feeling of busy-ness and procedure which I guess adds to the
absurdity factor.
I hate to keep bringing this back
up but I was amused with myself while reading my blurb on this episode for the Memorable Final Episodes article. Once again, I think of Yes Minister and Yes, Prime
Minister are two separate series with the same characters. The premises are
different. Yet, in my article from May 26th 2012, I clearly forgot
my stance on this oh-so-important issue. If I may dare quote myself, “I know I
went through a big argument about how Yes
Minister and Yes, Prime Minister
are one series. I still do look at it that way but this is the final episode of
the series to say Yes Minister on
the titles but more importantly it is a transitional episode.” Maybe I should
be in politics since I apparently waffle back and forth on this. I even link
back to an article where I state that I see this as two separate series which I
still do! Let’s see where I stand the
next time I look at one of these episodes!
As I also mentioned in the article
was how difficult it was to get a hold of a copy of Party Games. On KTCA here in Minnesota, it was years until this was
broadcast. It may have been the late 1990s but I think it was actually the
early 2000s. I assume the reason this was never imported over here was because
it was an hour long episode opposed to the usual 30 minute episode? Here is a
possible different theory, knowing how BBC sales, or Lionheart back in the day
worked, it’s possible that the episode was available but maybe the station had
to pay extra for it. The episode started
to show up in syndication after Lionheart went away and programs were starting
to be distributed by BBC Worldwide Americas. Of course, that is a theory and
probably not a very good one. Party Games
was shown over here in the late 1980s but not on PBS but on A&E.
If I may jog people’s mind here, it
may be hard to ever remember an A&E (cable channel in the USA) that did not
show Storage Wars, Dog the Bounty Hunter or Gene Simmons Family Jewels. At the very
beginning, they showed a great deal of British television. Amongst it was Yes, Prime Minister. Wait though, I was
talking about Yes Minister. Well,
when A&E started to show Yes, Prime
Minister they started with Party
Games as the series’ first episode. They went even as far as editing the Yes, Prime Minister credits over the
proper credits. I didn’t get the episode of Party
Games until the late 1990s for my collection and it was a 3rd or
4th generation VHS copy from the A&E broadcast. Because I am
odd, I went about to edit back in the proper Yes Minister opening credits as well as take out the commercial
breaks. When I watched it just recently, I can still remember where some of the
commercial breaks occurred. I watched this episode from the PAL DVD of Series 3
where the episode is included. It’s where it should be included. It is the last
episode of Yes Minister. I am
surprised and annoyed to see it is included in the US on the Yes, Prime Minister DVD set and not the
Yes Minister DVD set. That is
ridiculous! I sincerely hope that it at least has the proper Yes Minister opening credits. Please
tell me they do!
I personally prefer Yes Minister over Yes, Prime Minister. When I did some research to see how Party Games was released on VHS and DVD
I forgot a couple of things. First off, Yes,
Prime Minister had been released on VHS for quite some time. Out of the two
series, that one was released first over in the US & UK. Yes Minister was released on VHS in the
UK starting in 1994 but didn’t finish until Party
Games was released in 2001. In the US, Yes
Minister came out in 1998 on VHS but only the first series.
Party
Games pressed all the correct buttons for me. It’s a great transitional
episode that had a holiday theme without being overly Christmassy. To be honest
it is probably one of, if not my favourite episode of the entire series. There
are so many great quotes and so many great moments. Of course, they all
returned in 1986 with Yes, Prime
Minister. I wrote an article about the first two episodes of that series in
2011. Do you want to see it, please check it out here.
Update: As things sometimes do, life gets out of control and I have
not been able to do what I wanted to with this site for almost a month.
Remember back in November I had a competition to win some Doctor Who DVDs. I just want to let everyone know that I did pick winners back
in November and their prizes are on the way to them. The winners are:
Claws of Axos
Special Edition:Laura Rynberg
Nick Seidler
Doctor Who Series 7 Part One:
Max Romanowski
Christopher Krisocki
Next week: Even
though it will be after Christmas, let’s fit in one more holiday program. I
look at an episode of Hancock’s Half
Hour called Hancock’s Forty-Three
Minutes. Do the extra 13 minutes help this episode?
Have a great week!
Do you have feedback, article requests or want to talk about a program but do not want to leave a public comment? Feel free to drop me an e-mail at FTA13867@gmail.comI am on Twitter: @FromtheArchive
Also please subscribe to my From the Archive: British Television Blog Facebook Page for updates about new articles.
5 comments:
Back in the dark days, I bought myself the VHS tapes of Yes, Prime Minister. I was quite a while before I knew that Yes, Minister even existed, much less had a chance to see the episodes. It was much later still when I finally got to see Party Games. It was a gem then, and is still a gem.
On a side note, I am quite apprehensive about the upcoming revival/return of YPM. I suppose I will give it a shot, but can it live up to the standars of yesteryear?
I am sure KTCA showed Yes Minister back in the 1980s but I always figured, as I was young, it would be too over my head so I was very much a late adopter.
For the new series of Yes Prime Minister, I do wish they would have created new characters for those roles. It would have lived so much better in my own mind if these were just different people. I don't want some one else to play Jim Hacker or Sir Humphrey. Sure I will give it a shot but I don't know. Granted, I didn't mind Reggie Perrin but it was no where as good as the original.
So - just watched the first episode of the new rebooted Yes Prime Minister. If I had to sum it up in one word, that word would be YAWN. Although I was determined to give it a fair shake and watch it to the end, I was checking the remaining time all the way through. The laugh track was annoying and the acting was dire. David Haig has nothing on Paul Eddington, and Humphrey and Bernard just had no redeeming qualities. The script itself was ok, but it had no chance given the so-called acting. At this point I am not sure I will even bother with the following episodes, but I probably will out of a sense of duty. Still, once it is all over I may very well have to get out the dvd and watch the real thing to get rid of the foul aftertaste.
Hope this didn't come off as too negative, but I am not sure you can be too negative about this sad excuse for a comedy.
I have to admit that I am impressed you even watched it. I might give it a try but I really don't have too much interest. I am completely happy to enjoy all those episodes of Yes Minister/Yes, Prime Minister with Paul Eddington and Nigel Hawthorne.
I understand they showed one of the classic series episodes prior to the new one which I can't imagine helped matters at all.
Take care,
Greg
From the classy theme music to the end credits, Yes Minister exudes quality. The acting is reserved, the writing incisive and the situations never unbelievable. The set up is more or less the same every week, with Jim Hacker getting on his high horse about some misdemeanor or breach of procedure and then getting hoist by his own petard when he has to resort to similar skullduggery to save his own skin. Sir Humphrey always sees this coming and quietly uses the situation to his own advantage, with the final line from Humphrey's lips: 'Yes, Minister'.
Bernard was always stuck in the middle, but usually had his own gem of wisdom to help (usually) Hacker get off the hook.
Three seasoned actors working together like a well-oiled clock and a supporting cast of well-known stalwarts of the time made for excellent viewing.
Andy
Post a Comment