There was a time in my life that I
looked forward to Mondays. Let’s be honest, very few people look forward to
Mondays and so I will be more precise, I looked forward to Monday evenings. In
the early 1990s I was in high school and we had cable television. There was
this cable station known as A&E. Back then it stood for Arts &
Entertainment. I have no idea what it stands for these days; I don’t really
care. To me, there was something really special about A&E and what was
really unfortunate about it was that generally I took it for granted. I’ve
written about it before, stations “evolving”. Back in the day, when a station
ran a certain type of program, no one ever thought it would change. Why would
it?
Monday nights were great. As odd as
it sounds, I would finish my homework in time to watch Murphy Brown, I used to love that show. Most of the time, during
working on homework, I would watch Biography
on A&E. They were really well done. By 9pm, everything was set to watch one
of my favourite series, Lovejoy. Lovejoy, to me, encapsulated what I
thought British television should be: it was set out somewhere rural, was kind
of high class (for me at the time) because it dealt in the (sometime seedy)
world of art and had a set of characters that were funny but the situations
weren’t always funny. Sometimes they could even be deadly serious.
Recently, I wrote a review about Series 3 of Lovejoy
in which one of the blurbs from PR stuff I get with the discs called Lovejoy the “James Bond of the art
world”. That sentence turned me off right away. The reason I had so much
problem with it is that firstly, Lovejoy is nothing like James Bond and I still
fail to see why the comparison was made. Secondly, I don’t think anyone can
just label Lovejoy so easily. It is
a wonderfully unique series that should never be summed up by calling it James
Bond. So what is it?
Lovejoy was a series of novels written by Jonathan Gash (pen name)
starting in 1977. Lovejoy (which is his last name) is not only an antiques
dealer but at times a forgerer. What was most amazing about Lovejoy was the
fact that he was a divvy. A divvy is someone who can sense when an antique is
real and more importantly when it is worth something. It’s just an unreal
feeling they get. This underground world of antique dealings is portrayed in a
much more sinister light than what we see in the TV series. In fact so is
Lovejoy.
We never know Lovejoy’s first name.
He just prefers to go by Lovejoy and it fits. Lovejoy is actually a very
loveable rogue. By the time we meet him in the series, he has mostly gotten out
of the shady dealings. He would still dip back into it once and a while but he
had mainly cleaned up his act and was surrounded by a good group of friends.
I loved watching this series
because it was basically a drama with a lot of light humour brought into it.
The locations were beautiful and the writing was sharp. Every week, we would be
introduced to some antique treasure which had some amazing significance that we
would learn about. Of course, these treasures (and their back stories) weren’t real but they certainly fooled me. I
had a ritual every Monday night and that included by the time Lovejoy would start, I would make
myself a plate of chips and cheese, also known as nachos, and I would just
enjoy the latest installment of the series. It was always so much fun because I
would watch Lovejoy on TV from
9-10pm and the watch whatever British comedy series was running on my local PBS
station KTCA from 10-11. Probably either Are You Being Served?
or Keeping Up Appearances. This was a really fun and enjoyable time of my life.
By the time I got to 1993 things
changed quite a bit for me. I graduated from high school and was about to start
my first go round in college. I also ended up picking up a few jobs and most
Monday nights I would be working. The feasting on Lovejoy would have to wait as I was too busy to keep up with it. When
I did watch it, I noticed one of my least favourite things about a TV series
that had gone on too long, cast changes. I will get to that in a bit. From what
I had seen, it was becoming a show that I was losing interest in. Therefore, I
had stopped watching from around Series 5. To this day, there are a few
episodes I had not yet seen. In fact, this was the first time I had seen the
episode we are looking at today.
The
Lost Colony TX: 27/12/93
This non-Yuletide episode of
Lovejoy starts with an estate sale. Lord Wakering needs to sell his Manor Home
as well as many of its belongings. This is where Lovejoy comes in. He is
helping Charlotte Cavendish with the sale. This is where my interaction with
this series dwindled over time. I seemed to have fallen out of love with the
series perhaps around the right time.
At the end of Universal Films in
the 1930s, the screen would say “A good cast is worth repeating.” My take is
that I think a good cast is impossible to replace. By the time we get into
Series 5, we soon lose two great characters that I thought really made Lovejoy special. We lose Lady Jane who
has been a close friend to Lovejoy and sometimes closer than just frends. She
really was his rock. She helped him emotionally and financially. Then, there
was Eric Catchpole played by Chris Jury. We meet Eric in the first episode, The Firefly Cage, as his father kind of
pawns him off on Lovejoy to try and teach Eric in the ways of antiques
dealings. Eric was a loveable buffoon. He was able to play off with well with
Lovejoy and Tinker but the dynamics were different between the two. He was a
great double act with Tinker and I think they could have easily made a spin-off
between the two. With Eric leaving created a crater sized hole in the series.
In fact, to be honest, it prejudices me when I watch any post-Eric Lovejoy. To put it in terms of
antiques, it’s like finding a wonderful-old piece only to be ultra-cleaned by
non-professionals removing all of its charm.
Back to the episode at hand,
Lovejoy meets a woman who is into antiques of the period and is from America,
in fact the South. Not only is she from America but she is also a Lovejoy. Her
name is Mary-John Lovejoy and there are apparently a whole lot of Lovejoy’s living
in North Carolina. They are also really well to do. While she is still in town,
there is a robbery of some historically important pieces from Wakering’s house.
These items have to do with Sir Walter Raleigh and the Lost Colony. The Lost
Colony is an area off of North Carolina that Sir Walter Raleigh found that
eventually lost. He called it the lost colony which it is Roanoke Island.
The one aspect of Lovejoy I have always loved was how we
are exposed different pieces of antiques and the unique stories behind each
piece. Not that many of these were real pieces or had real stories, the history
of these mythical pieces were always fun and made the character of Lovejoy and
Tinker very believable because they were such experts. These stories really
sold the episodes.
Yet there is some truth to this
story. Although this is not a physical piece, The Lost Colony was a real thing.
The Queen granted Sir Water Raleigh a charter to colonize North America in
1583. Raleigh lands on what becomes Roanoke Island. The final group of colonists disappeared during
the Anglo-Spanish
War, three years after
the last shipment of supplies from England. Their disappearance gave rise to the nickname
"The Lost Colony". To this day there has been no conclusive evidence
as to what happened to the colonists. Theories
range from Native-Americans attacking and killing them to the colonists just
moving somewhere else. In this episode, I got the impression that they are
referring to the “lost colony” as a physical place. Like maybe they were
looking for an island.
With the items stolen, Lovejoy
feels a personal responsibility to get them back. He immediately knows who took
them based on being at the house ate the time of the robbery. He recognized the
unique perfume of Mary-John. Lovejoy
hops onto a plane a travels to North America to track down Mary-John. Let’s set
the record straight. I hate it when British television series have episodes set
in America. I hate it. Cue the stereotypical Americans and our lack of
understanding anything that is not US. Don’t think for a moment I don’t think that
as a culture the US can be very dim but I hate watching it because it
generalize. Plus because it takes place in the South, we must have banjo music
and the magazine the cop is reading is Guns & Ammo. I also hate US
series that go over to the UK. Cue the stereotypical Britons. The only
exception is The Beverly Hillbillies
episode where the Clampetts go to the UK and Phil Silvers cons them into
thinking that they are buying some amazing British treasures such as Buckingham
Palace. In this episode we have the dim-witted southern cops, the Southerns
with a ridiculous drawl and people commenting to Lovejoy that he sounds funny. Hilarity
ensues.
It turns out that in North
Carolina, there have been a long run of Lovejoys and they have built up a
business. By the time it is all said and done, Lovejoy gets the historical
pieces back. I give the impression that I didn’t like the episode. I didn’t
mind it. It’s not that bad but if I started to watch Lovejoy with this episode, or any around this period of time, I
wouldn’t have bothered with any more episodes. This episode is an example of
how the series loses its energy and is just average. Lovejoy is not an average series.
When the series starts out, Lovejoy
himself is a bit of a rogue. He cleans himself up a bit but always has some of
the criminal charm. Lovejoy falls into the Mickey Mouse syndrome a little bit. Mickey
Mouse starts out as a not so great character. He pulls on other animal tails,
he nearly takes advantage of Minnie Mouse in a couple of those early shorts. Yet,
as time goes on, he mellows and the characters that are around him take the
center stage for being more colorful. As Mickey becomes more established, he is
written to be more wholesome.
Can the same scenario be applied to
Lovejoy? Maybe not the same extreme but as the series went on, he became more
of an antique dealer expert instead of the rogue who needed to do the dodgy
deals for the greater good. That was alright though because of such great
characters as Eric and Tinker. Tinker needed Eric otherwise he becomes more of
the odd man out. The characters in this installment don’t do much for me at
all. There is Beth who takes on the role of Eric. She is learning the business
but is not given much to do, at least in this episode. She is kind of a wasted
character. There is Charlotte Cavendish who for all intents and purposes is the
new Lady Jane. She is fine but it is hard to let go of the old favourites. Then,
I breathed a sigh of relief.
In walks in Charlie Gimbert. Played
beautifully by the late Malcolm Tierney, he is the Sheriff of Nottingham to
Lovejoy’s Robin Hood. He is wonderfully villain in this series. He does nasty
stuff to annoy and alienate Lovejoy but he is immensely loveable. I forgot he
was still in the series by this point but even as brief as his appearance was,
it still harked back memories to the good ol’ days!
What I am not a fan with this
episode is that we see that there are more Lovejoys. There is a whole clan of
them back in the states. I liked it when we didn’t know so much about Lovejoy. He
is not necessarily a mysterious character, it’s just that there is some mystery
to him. I don’t think the series should be about him in terms of his family.
This is not a major aspect of it but one that is still unnecessary, perhaps
getting too familiar. I am a fan of the paranormal aspect to this story. In
Wakering’s house, there is a ghost that goes back a long way. She makes things
very difficult for a lot of people, especially the new residents of the house.
So much so that they move out and sell the house back to Wakering. The way it
is done in the episode is a little far-fetched but then again, it’s not meant to
scare the viewer.
Some interesting people took part
in this episode that should be noted. First of all, Sir John Gielgud played
Lord Wakering, Arthur Cox who also I also enjoyed as Cully in the Doctor Who story The Dominators. On the American side, there is Barbara Barrie who I
found interesting. I have seen her in other things such as playing Barney’s
wife Elizabeth on Barney Miller. She
also played Elizabeth Potter in the Reggie
which is the US version of The Fall and
Rise of Reginald Perrin. That was made in 1983. I have always wanted to
write an article about US comedies that originated from the UK. Once I get a
copy of Beane’s of Boston, I’ll be
able to do that.
Behind the scenes, the film was
directed by Geoffrey Sax. He did a lot of things. I remember his episodes of The New Statesman and he was also the
director to the 1996 TV Movie of Doctor Who starring Paul McGann. There
are some really great shots in The Lost
Colony such as near the beginning as we see Miss Lillian walking across the
street into a cemetery and what appears to be a normal shot elevates as it
becomes a really tall and ambitious crane shot. Some of that stuff is the
highlight of the film. It is interesting to note that Jo Wright is Producer of Lovejoy by this point. She served as
Executive Producer for the BBC on the 1996 Doctor
Who TV Movie and is currently an Executive Producer on Midsomer Murders. Clearly, she
likes the same TV series I do.
If you want to start somewhere to
watch Lovejoy, don’t start here.
Start at the beginning and watch a very funny and unique show. This episode
isn’t quite it.
Next week: What do M, Sergeant Wilson, and Magenta from The Rocky Horror Picture Show have in
common? Find out when we look at the 1977 BBC production of A Christmas Carol. Not so much of the
article will be about the plot but we will look at the practice of releasing
good BBC productions other places than the UK!
Have a great week!Do you have feedback, article requests or want to talk about a program but do not want to leave a public comment? Feel free to drop me an e-mail at FTA13867@gmail.com
Also please subscribe to my From the Archive: British Television Blog Facebook Page for updates about new articles.
4 comments:
I was getting bore since morning but as soon as I got this link & reached at this blog, I turned into fresh and also joyful too.
go
This article is actually remarkable one it helps many new users that desire to read always the best stuff.
go outside
Very well written and researched. I too was incredibly disappointed when I ordered the Christmas DVD only to find there was nothing "Christmassy" about any of those episodes. Anyway thanks for a really interesting read and perspective.
Stephen.
But does it need to be Christmassy to be a Christmas episode? Can it be festive without being Christmassy? I kind of like stuff like Only Fools and Horses having fun episodes like The Jolly Boys Outing and not being tied exclusively to the holiday. It's an interesting question.
Post a Comment